# Ollama vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ollama | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 95/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 185 212 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 559 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 51 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.40.13 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Ollama scores 95/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Ollama ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 559 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ollama](https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ollama-vs-transcriber