# Ollama vs ontime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ollama | ontime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 95/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 185 201 ✓ | 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 548 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 51 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.40.13 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Ollama scores 95/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

Ollama ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.

If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; ontime needs more configuration.

Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 548 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ollama](https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama.md)
- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ollama-vs-ontime