# OJS vs youtube-dl-nas

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OJS | youtube-dl-nas |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 ✓ | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OJS scores 62/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.

youtube-dl-nas ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.

If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl-nas is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.

OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OJS](https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs.md)
- [youtube-dl-nas](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl-nas.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ojs-vs-youtube-dl-nas