# OJS vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OJS | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

OJS scores 62/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

心潮动态心智系统 ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.

If you want the quickest setup, 心潮动态心智系统 is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.

OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OJS](https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ojs-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind