OJSvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OJS scores 62/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-openwakeword ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.
If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-openwakeword is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
OJS details →wyoming-openwakeword details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep wyoming-openwakeword, compare it with