# OJS vs Whatomate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OJS | Whatomate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #37 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 1 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OJS scores 62/100 against 53/100 for Whatomate, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Whatomate is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.

OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OJS](https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs.md)
- [Whatomate](https://selfhost.directory/project/whatomate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whatomate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ojs-vs-whatomate