OJSvsWhatomate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | Whatomate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #37 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 1 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OJS scores 62/100 against 53/100 for Whatomate, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Whatomate is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
OJS details →Whatomate details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep Whatomate, compare it with