OJSvswebarchive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | webarchive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #11 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 200 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OJS scores 62/100 against 40/100 for webarchive, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, webarchive is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
OJS details →webarchive details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep webarchive, compare it with