# OJS vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OJS | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 1 505 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OJS scores 62/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

usque ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.

If you want the quickest setup, usque is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.

OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OJS](https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ojs-vs-usque