# OJS vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OJS | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OJS scores 62/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.

If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.

OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OJS](https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ojs.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ojs-vs-urocissa