OJSvsUglyFeed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | UglyFeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OJS scores 62/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.
UglyFeed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.
If you want the quickest setup, UglyFeed is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
OJS is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
OJS details →UglyFeed details →
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep UglyFeed, compare it with