# Octoprint vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-wbo