# Octoprint vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 9 168 | 17 185 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+58 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-upptime