# Octoprint vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 24 940 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +168 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-tasmota