# Octoprint vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 38 328 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +1 920 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 920 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-sglang