# Octoprint vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 9 170 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-ryot