# Octoprint vs RabbitMQ

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | RabbitMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 13 949 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +78 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [RabbitMQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rabbitmq.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-rabbitmq