# Octoprint vs PostHog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 40 497 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +588 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3503 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3893.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PostHog scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

PostHog ships more often: 3503 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.

PostHog is growing faster right now (+588 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [PostHog](https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-posthog