# Octoprint vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 61 544 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-pi-hole