# Octoprint vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 9 170 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 ✓ | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-peertube