# Octoprint vs Owncast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | Owncast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 9 170 | 11 632 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +76 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint and Owncast score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.

If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [Owncast](https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-owncast