# Octoprint vs openvox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | openvox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 ✓ | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.

openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [openvox](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-openvox