# Octoprint vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Octoprint | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 82 352 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +3 336 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octoprint-vs-omniroute