OctoBotvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+258 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with