# OctoBot vs Umbraco CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | Umbraco CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 ✓ | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [Umbraco CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbraco-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-umbraco-cms