OctoBotvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 27 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with