# OctoBot vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 56 876 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 ✓ | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-typst