# OctoBot vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 117 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +5 569 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-tradingagents