# OctoBot vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 6 874 | 47 723 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +267 ✓ | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+267 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-text-generation-webui