# OctoBot vs Syslog-ng

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | Syslog-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 ✓ | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 ✓ | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

OctoBot scores 69/100 against 66/100 for Syslog-ng, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-syslog-ng