# OctoBot vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 114 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +3 538 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-supabase