OctoBotvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with