# OctoBot vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 ✓ | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 ✓ | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OctoBot scores 69/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-panwatch