# OctoBot vs OmniTools

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OctoBot | OmniTools |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 6 873 | 10 517 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +270 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)
- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octobot-vs-omnitools