# octo-server vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | octo-server | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #37 of 110 in Chat | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 101 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.24.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 53/100 for octo-server, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; octo-server needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [octo-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/octo-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octo-server.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octo-server-vs-text-generation-webui