# octelium vs Webhook.site

> Two self-hosted [ngrok alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/ngrok), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | octelium | Webhook.site |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #23 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 4 132 | 6 786 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Webhook.site scores 66/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Webhook.site.

If you want the quickest setup, Webhook.site is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

octelium is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)
- [Webhook.site](https://selfhost.directory/project/webhooksite) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webhooksite.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octelium-vs-webhooksite