# octelium vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | octelium | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 134 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

## Details

- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octelium-vs-ryot