# octelium vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | octelium | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 4 134 | 35 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +506 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octelium-vs-qdrant