# octelium vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | octelium | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 4 134 | 393 343 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +2 919 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for octelium.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/octelium-vs-openclaw