octeliumvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| octelium | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 4 134 | 393 322 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +2 898 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for octelium.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).
octelium details →openclaw details →