# Observal vs Traffic Source

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Observal | Traffic Source |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #40 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 4 534 ✓ | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 160 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.16.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Observal scores 65/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.

Observal ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.

Observal is growing faster right now (+1 160 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Observal](https://selfhost.directory/project/observal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/observal.md)
- [Traffic Source](https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/observal-vs-traffic-source