ObscuravsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Obscura | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 29 553 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +469 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Obscura scores 75/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; Xibo CMS needs more configuration.
Obscura is growing faster right now (+469 stars in 30 days).
Obscura details →Xibo CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Obscura, compare it with
Keep Xibo CMS, compare it with