ObscuravsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Obscura | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 29 553 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +469 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
Obscura scores 75/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.
Obscura is growing faster right now (+469 stars in 30 days).
Obscura details →WPS Office details →
Swap a project
Keep Obscura, compare it with
Keep WPS Office, compare it with