# Obscura vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 29 544 ✓ | 8 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 ✓ | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-workout-cool