# Obscura vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 531 ✓ | 4 032 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 ✓ | +133 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-wanderer