# Obscura vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted [Web Scraping projects](https://selfhost.directory/web-scraping), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 29 526 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-url-to-png