# Obscura vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 564 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +480 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+480 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-typetype