# Obscura vs Turtl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | Turtl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 29 570 ✓ | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +486 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; Turtl needs more configuration.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+486 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [Turtl](https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turtl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-turtl