# Obscura vs trusted-cgi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Obscura | trusted-cgi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 29 537 ✓ | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Obscura scores 75/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+453 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)
- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/obscura-vs-trusted-cgi