Obscuravsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Obscura | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 29 526 | 393 265 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | +2 917 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 917 stars in 30 days).
Obscura details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Obscura, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with